Continued Studies - 07/06/2006 (The Use Of A Muse)

CONTINUED STUDIES

Of

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

Observations

And

General Philosophy

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

02/16/2006 ~ 07/19/2006

07/06/2006

Again, putting thought toward the use of that consistent body of corrupt tendencies within society, and as well in considering the amplified version of it within modern communications and the advent of technology - it occurs to me that to fight such, is futile, but to employ it - even anonymously to some degree, not only seems it would act to contain it, but also put it to that use i was exploring possibilities for previously.

Within such considerations as said consistency and said amplified occurrence - I then realize that it would be possible to orchestrate even the larger version of it within communications technology - then further from that medium, find some success in orchestrating other forms of it within society.

I can see employing the illusion of randomness - not because it is actually not random in such mediums, but within the larger movement of it - such would find yet another level of consistency through the seemingly random combinations of motion.

I would do this in utilizing the already existing tendencies within modern communication toward those various forms of corruption (and those being criminal) through introducing random sequences of existing ploys so to speak.

For example, I would devise a program which would be planted much like a virus in major databases - (uh-Hem) Legal institutions, Credit bureau's...etc. - this program would be designed to accommodate a re-occurring, timed function, as well as provide access for a given social element in the technology world - for which to contribute information to this program within those data bases.

In so many words, this emulation would combine the tendencies toward things such as criminal activities in communications technology (identity theft, scams, scams using government entities, credit fraud) already existing, then combine it with the common reasoning's (excuses) and justifications for such activity (being related to the destruction = commerce mentality), in creating the opportunity and fuel for various programs within governmental structures - legal areas of various sorts, peripheral programs/non-profits. Then, in a random manner people from within society would be selected as potential - more like eventual victims of this ploy.

This would then result in having various fraudulent claims perpetrated against them - but not necessarily within the legal arena - without their knowledge at first, and within a re-occurring timed window - as well as various forms of fictitious and frivolous debt claims being circulated in the same manner - again, in timed appearances within this program cycle and within an even larger circulation (movement) between databases (and in that then, locations).

Once there is a substantial amount of at least potential victims in this cyclical movement, the larger consistency of its motion will begin to take shape (even within the random elements of it) - though maintain the random appearance which already exists in similar ploys that are not to this level of design.

This will then act to draw the attention of those prone to such forms of corruption, as well - being seen as opportunity from their perspectives - which of course, is the design.

This isn't meant to entrap perpetrators and whether or not it is believed, is not meant to destroy the lives of otherwise productive people. In so many words, it is very much to provide for that tendency which no will acknowledge, though many benefit from - and simultaneously preventing the more catastrophic results from those forms of ignorance, from manifesting and resulting in some cases as social fission. It is meant to introduce an efficiency within something that just seems to be an accepted part of society - that is, as long as it always happens to someone else.

Given, it seems to be a bit cruel to anonymously subject unsuspecting individuals to such potential hardships - but firstly I will point out that the timed and cycling movement of the program will at least present the chance that they won't get nabbed for the fictitious offenses and violations - but even if they do, it then only continues to contribute to the dynamic of already existing similar ploys which are seen as some form of efficiency for some reason.

Further then, as another social benefit of such a program, is in presenting a consistency and containment element which will actually insulate the majority of society from said victimization through polarizing the potential result - as well as present more safety within the consistency. ~

Further then, within this hypothetical social ploy, I personally would utilize the media as well. it has long been known of the potential dangers to society in the use of media for direct propaganda ploys. It has also been known that this danger arises from the tendency of the public to become enthralled - as with a system for musing that I toy with and am developing (described in other works), I would then utilize the information collected from that random data ploy in conjunction with that musing system and as well incorporate the developing relationships between those potential victims and those thinking that they are victimizing, as creative fuel and information for that co-existing media ploy.

To briefly explain this musing toy ;

It essentially utilizes different aspects of two or more influences (muses - points of focus) to comprise the sum of one character so to speak.

This would insure a certain stability within society through utilizing both that tendency to become fanatic as well as the random usage of various influences in compiling said displays.

This further insures the safety of said media/mediums in keeping them from becoming tools of direct social propaganda.

The danger I see (and which is obvious) in permitting such direct propaganda usage, is in the same direction as is building a huge machine or weapon that is so consistent that anyone can use it. A direct machine for propaganda can then be wielded by anyone for any reason and endeavor.

In maintaining a certain randomness, it insures the continued successful use of said medium - as well as maintaining creative potentials of and for said medium. This then maintains a safer and changing motion within said resulting fanaticism - on both sides of that line concerning media and society as a public/private body.